The
year’s best April Fools joke was played a day late, and on the GOP. On April 2nd
Mark Sanford won the Republican primary for the 1st congressional
seat of South Carolina. Sanford has won the right to face Elizabeth Colbert
Busch, who happens to be the sister of late night personality (and Super PAC
owner) Stephen Colbert. The RNC has been thrust into a lose-lose situation.
They can either get in a fundraising and media battle with Colbert to save a seat
they have not spent money on in decades, or they can watch Colbert’s sister
steal a historically red seat out from under them. Either option looks bad for
a party relying on its stranglehold on both the South and the House of
Representatives. This race is more than just a funny headline that ought be
gracing the cover of The Onion; this is another example of the crossroads that
must be faced by todays Republican Party.
Incredibly, Sanford could potentially
win, as recent polls have him behind Colbert Busch by as little as two points.
This is a very wealthy and right-leaning district. It is also essentially the
same district (after 2012 redistricting) as the one Sanford represented in the
early 2000s.
If
Sanford does manage to win, the GOP must be questioning how beholden he will be
to them. National and local Republicans did not exactly rush to Sanford’s aid
when his scandal broke and many of them were certainly hoping that his opponent
would win the Republican primary.
Has there ever been a bigger wild card
politician than Sanford? He has risen like a phoenix out of his self inflicted
ashes and seems determined to gain power once again. This man seems bound by
nothing. His party will be supporting him only for congressional seat numbers,
his constituents only because they are demographically far too conservative for
Colbert Busch to truly represent their will. If he is elected, nothing will
stop him from voting however he desires. The man truly has nothing to lose and
no one to represent but himself.
Sanford has been running a campaign based
on redemption. It’s a smart gambit. Bring up your affair before anyone else
does and your opponents cannot talk about it. Ask your mistress to become your
fiancé and take her on the campaign trail. Suddenly she has a name (Belen
Chapur) and a face. He has repeatedly thanked her for her longstanding
suffering. Voters are starting to feel sympathy for her. Sanford has turned his
greatest weakness into a strength.
But there is someone else Sanford has
been thanking besides his fiancé: God. Religion and forgiveness have become the
backbone of this campaign. This is probably a good thing for Sanford, but it is
definitely a bad thing for the conservative party.
The RNC is trying to move away from the
stigma that their party is controlled by the far right wing and that Evangelical
Christians make up the party base. In contrast, it appears Sanford will run on
a social conservative platform.
If the RNC chooses to roll out big bucks
to bail out Sanford, they will be forced to tap into campaign coffers meant for
the all-important 2014 congressional elections. Republicans can simply not
afford to lose their congressional majority.
The Republican Party is truly at a
crossroads. They must abandon the tainted and extreme right wing elements of
their party to have a fighting chance. The Republican party of the last eight
years has been characterized as too old, uncompromising, sloppy, and stupid to
win the big elections. They are trying to move in a new direction by placing
the moderate Christie and Latino Rubio at the vanguard of their party.
The 2012 election gave them a jolt. Party
leadership saw the writing on the wall and they have tried to change. They have
taken some new more progressive stances on policy, most notably in immigration.
But they seem unable to help themselves from
continuing to support bad candidates in important, public races.
How many Newt Gingriches and Mark
Sanfords must the Republican Party suffer through before they decide enough is
enough? Southern white males who philander are a bad investment. You do not see
the DNC letting John Edwards out of his cage much these days.
Updating their party’s platform on key
issues was a step. An actual effort to gain the Latino vote will help too. But
until the RNC stops aiding candidates like Sanford, and even allowing them to
run, their hopes for 2014 and beyond will look just as bleak as they did on
November 7, 2012.
At least one aspect of your commentary on the Republican party is absolutely correct; They cannot continue on the same path and expect different results on election day. It took several rounds of abuse before the party leadership finally stood up to announce their support for an open look at previously hard-stance Republican positions. Most recently (as you mentioned), the issue of immigration reform rose to the daily headlines as the bipartisan "Gang of 8" released their plan for a pathway to citizenship of America's 11 million undocumented citizens.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, I think you've missed the mark in your chosen examples of candidates the party should forgo. It would seem logical for a party to neglect politicians whose reputations have been tarnished by scandal. The research however on over 250 cases of congressional malfeasance indicates that politicians can successfully reemerge from scandals a majority of the time. I wrote more about this view with supporting research on my own blog at the following link and I encourage you to check to out: http://politicalcommunicationandmessaging.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-missing-impact-of-scandals.html
So while I agree with your reviews about the need for fundamental reforms within the Republican party, I disagree with your assessment regarding the political demise of candidates like Mark Sanford.
"Southern white males who philander are a bad investment." Not only is this not true, it is also not an exclusive facet of the Republican Party that you propose. Two words. Bill Clinton! Enough said.
ReplyDeletePhilandering and public scandals are not something that is unique to the Republican Party, nor are they as career destroying as they used to be.
As evidenced with President Bill Clinton the public are able and willing to forgive politicians who engage in moral misdeeds. The electorate are changing. Moral relativism has replaced absolute morality. What is good for me is not necessarily good for you. That is the position we have found ourselves in today. We no longer feel the need to impose our morality on others.
Mark Sanford and Anthony Weiner will do well in their respective races. They may not win, but I doubt the morality of their previous choices will play much into the electorate's decision.
I appreciate the link Jared, that is a very interesting set of Data. Andrew I certainly do agree that this not simply being a Republican issue, Anthony Weiner is prime example that this is not simply a Republican problem. This post was simply about flaws within the Republican party, specifically their strategy, funding and who they choose to back.
ReplyDeleteWhile I do agree that this is not simply a Republican issue, I do not see Mark Sanford or Anthony Weiner doing that well in their respective races:
Weiner is not getting support from the DNC or the New York Democratic party. They are supporting current Speaker of the New York City Council, Christine Quinn. She is up over Wiener by 15 points. Polls are showing that the electorate has a negative view of Weiner, and do not even fully support him running:
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2013/04/q-poll-tabs-anthony-weiner-2-in-hypothetical-ny-mayor-primary-negs-still-high
Democratic leadership is not supporting him; that's the difference.
Meanwhile Sanford is in a dead heat in a district that has voted vastly Republican for the last several decades:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/297675-poll-sanford-colbert-busch-tied-in-south-carolina
On top of that, a further episode in his scandal led to the GOP pulling funding from his campaign; so they obviously do view his scandal as important.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/17/gop-pulls-funds-sanford-election-bid/
Unfortunately for the GOP they came to this conclusion way to late, having all ready pumped lots of money into his campaign.